11574_Understanding HR practices in Irish hotels and their implications for employee retention in

ii

Understanding HR practices in
Irish hotels and their
implications for employee
retention in the sector

Dissertation submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements
for the degree of
MBA in Human Resource Management
at Dublin Business School

Mila Ramos de Souza (10004905)

MBA in Human Resource Management

August 2015
Word count: 18249 words
iii

Declaration

I, Mila Ramos de Souza, declare that this research is my original work and that it has never
been presented to any institution or university for the award of Degree or Diploma. In
addition, I have referenced correctly all literature and sources used in this work and this this
work is fully compliant with the Dublin Business School’s academic honesty policy.

Signed: Mila Ramos de Souza
Date: 21/08/2015

iv

Acknowledgments
In full gratitude I would like to acknowledge the following individuals who encouraged,
inspired, supported and assisted me throughout my dissertation.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor David Wallace for the useful
comments, remarks and engagement through the learning process of this dissertation.
I am grateful to all lectures who shared their knowledge and expertise during the course.
I also thank my fellow classmates for the stimulating discussions and for all fun we have had
in the last year.
In addition a thank you to all hotel managers and professional who have willingly shared
precious time and useful information during the process of interviewing.
Last but not least, I would like to thank my family and friends here and in Brazil for all the
support, and in special to my mum and my husband. Their encouragement and quiet patience
helped to complete the experience of MBA course and proved that I am able to tackle
challenges head on.

“Set your goals high, and don’t stop till you get there”.
Bo Jackson

v

Abstract
The research investigates the impacts of human resource practices on levels of
employee retention in the Irish hotel industry context. The material gathered in this study
provides an understanding of the following HR practices: training and development, rewards
and employee wellbeing. The primary survey was conducted among the HR professionals in
the hotels in Dublin by face-to-face interviews. The results suggest that although most
participants perceive the importance of HR, the hotels can develop their practices better in
order to retain their employees. It is argued that the current and emerging challenges facing
the industry demand an approach to HRM that is far more strategic in which practices and
policies can contribute for the decision of employees stay in the companies. In the
conclusion, a conceptual framework is presented showing the relation between focused HR
practices and employee retention. Therefore, the results from the research can be really useful
for Irish hotel, as a reduction in employee turnover would be a significant factor for
competitive advantage.

vi

Table of Contents
1. Introduction
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
3
2. Literature Review…………………………………………………………………………………………………….
6
2.1 Literature Introduction
…………………………………………………………………………………………
6
2.2 Strategic Human Resource Management and the impact of HPWS …………………………..
6
2.3 HR Practices ………………………………………………………………………………………………………
9
2.3.1 Training and Development
……………………………………………………………………………..
9
2.3.2 Reward Management……………………………………………………………………………………
11
2.3.3 Employee Wellbeing ……………………………………………………………………………………
12
2.4 Employee retention
……………………………………………………………………………………………
13
2.5 Employee turnover in hospitality industry ……………………………………………………………
15
2.6 Literature Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………..
16
3. Methodology …………………………………………………………………………………………………………
18
3.1 Methodology Introduction
………………………………………………………………………………….
18
3.2 Research Design ……………………………………………………………………………………………….
19
3.2.1 Research Philosophy ……………………………………………………………………………………
19
3.2.2 Research Approach ……………………………………………………………………………………..
19
3.2.3 Research Strategy
………………………………………………………………………………………..
20
3.2.4 Sampling – Selecting Respondents
…………………………………………………………………
21
3.3 Data Collection Instruments ……………………………………………………………………………….
22
3.4 Research Ethics
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
23
3.5 Limitations of Methodology
……………………………………………………………………………….
24
4. Data Analysis and Findings …………………………………………………………………………………….
25
4.1 Findings …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
25
4.1.1 Importance of SHRM …………………………………………………………………………………..
25
4.1.2 Talent management initiatives ………………………………………………………………………
26
4.1.3 HR practises in the hotel industry ………………………………………………………………….
27
4.1.4 Training programs ……………………………………………………………………………………….
27
4.1.5 Career Advice
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
28
4.1.6 Career opportunities …………………………………………………………………………………….
28
4.1.7 Reward initiatives
………………………………………………………………………………………..
29
4.1.8 Employee wellbeing
…………………………………………………………………………………….
29
4.1.9 Retention practices ………………………………………………………………………………………
30
vii

4.1.10 Challenges ………………………………………………………………………………………………..
30
5. Discussion …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
33
6. Conclusions/Recommendations
……………………………………………………………………………….
40
6.1 Limitations and Directions for Future Research
…………………………………………………….
43
7. Reflections ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
45
8. References
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
50
9. Appendices
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
56

List of Tables and Figures
Figure 1 The research ‘onion’ ………………………………………………………………………………………
18
Figure 2 Summary of findings …………………………………………………………………………………….
32
Figure 3 Employee Retention Conceptual Framework
……………………………………………………
41
Figure 4 Core Model for Reflection……………………………………………………………………………..
45
3

1. Introduction
In the current competitive market, employee’s retention strategies are essential for
companies to gain competitive advantage. Certainly, turnover is not always harmful, but a
high turnover rate brings on significant issues for the company such as financial costs, work
disruptions, and losses of organizational memory and seasoned mentors associated (Allen et
al, 2010, p. 48). Particularly in the Irish context, retaining qualified employees has become a
challenge for various industries. For instance, McCarthy et al (2007, p. 248), in their study in
the Republic of Ireland, identified that a significant number of nurses expressing the intention
to leave their current post were identified, and there are serious implications for workforce
planning. Therefore, it seems to be essential for companies that they try to retain their
valuable employees, who contribute at their best level to achieve the overall organisation
goals.
Competitive advantage through employees is becoming more important because
organisations are focusing on their internal resources and viewing human resources as a
source of value (Otteribacher and Howley, 2005, p. 85). In this way, the Human Resources
Management (HRM) strategies applied by the companies play an important role in managing
their employees. A recent survey called The 2014 Global Talent Management and Rewards
(Towers Watson, 2104, p.1) shows that most of interviewed organisations have problems to
attract and keep key talent, including top performers and high-potential employees. For this
reason, a well-designed talent management plan — to effectively hire, retain, deploy, and
engage all employees— is a true competitive advantage a company possesses (Oladapo,
2014, p. 20).
In this way, HR practices and policies can be a support or barrier to employees decide
to stay or not in a company. Many factors, such as organizational culture, payment rates,
benefits and rewards system, training, career development opportunities and employee
wellbeing impact on employee turnover’s levels in the companies (Narang, 2013, p. 48). For
that reason, a strategic HRM planning of approaches has the potential to not only increase the
effectiveness of the relationship between employee and the employer, but also to recognise
the welfare of employees is fundamental in the achievement of organisational objectives.
Besides, when organisations make low HR investments, their employees are not very
demanding in what they expect (Piening et al, 2014, p. 562). This may affect the companies’
perspective about their desire to invest in their capabilities.
4

One of the HR issues in the hospitality industry, particularly in hotels, is related to
high employee turnover (Kyuhwan, 2006; Hui-O and Rd. Hsin-Wei, 2009). Faldetta et al
(2013, p. 584) state that, amongst different different reasons which cause turnover, the
seasonal nature of the hospitality industry leads managers to hire and fire employees
according to the rhythm of regular seasonal oscillations. In the Asia scenario, many
employees regard hospitality work as a pass-through to a job in a higher level industry,
instead of a life-time career commitment (Hui-O and Hsin-Wei, 2009, p. 205). In another
research, Wilton (2006, p. 903) affirms that HRM in the UK hotel industry “is typically held
to be informal, instrumental and associated with poor employment relation”, consequently
leading to significant levels of turnover. Townsend and Lee (2010, p. 65) reinforce this idea
saying that hotel industry is usually not concern with personnel management and training,
with only few staff having a job description, and an essentially impersonal approach with
employees. In the Northern Ireland market, Baum and Devine findings (2007, p. 278) point to
the fact that front office work offers unstable prospects in terms of career developments due
to relatively limited promotional prospects and low wages. They suggest that a more
competitive system and effective measures could help to attract and keep better talent.
In addition to these findings, a research done by Deloitte (2010) adds that the average
labour turnover is considered high for the UK industry scoring, which is approximately 30%
and approximately 31% for the US. Despite these significant rates of labour spend, the
employee turnover in the industry remains high, and companies should start to rethink their
people management strategies.
Considering these factors, this research aims to uncover this question:
How HR practices can combine to increase employee retention in the Irish Hotels?
The dissertation aims to identify the HR practices which have been applied by Irish
hotels and how they may influence on the employee’s decision to stay or leave the company.
The research will be focused on practices particularly related to training, reward
management and employee wellbeing as they are considered vital for motivating employees
and creating a long term association between organisation and employees.
It is important to consider the importance of Tourism in Ireland and the significant
number of people who works in the Irish hotel industry: approximately 54.000 individuals
(Irish Hotels Federation, 2013). Besides, the Irish Accommodation market has become more
competitive: hotels is the strongest sector, but hostels reported a 61% increase in their overall
5

visitor volumes in the beginning of 2015; and guesthouses have showed gradual
improvements, having better expectations for 2015 (Fáilte Ireland, 2015, p. 3 and p. 14).
Another aspect to be considered is the popularity growth of peer-to-peer platforms such as
Airbnb. Potential hosts offer their spare rooms or apartments on this platform, establish their
own nightly, weekly or monthly price, and offer accommodation to guests. In their research
about the impact of Airbnb in the Texas market hotel, Zervas et al (2013, p. 25) identified
that Airbnb has a negative impact on hotel room revenue in this area, mainly affecting lower-
end hotels and hotels not catering to business travellers.
Facing this competition, hoteliers need to be prepared to invest in the development
and training of their workforces at all levels. Irish hotels have competed for talent and
customers, and HRM seems necessary to enhance their talent operations by more strategically
aligning or interweaving their teams with other divisions of the business. Therefore, the
results from the research can be really useful for this sector, as a reduction in employee
turnover would be a significant factor for competitive advantage by, for example, reducing
hotel costs and improving labour productivity.

6

2. Literature Review

2.1 Literature Introduction
The purpose of this literature review is to present a range of knowledge and ideas
which consist in the background of this research question. There is a significant body of
academic literature about employee retention and HR practices, and it is essential to
understand these topics to assess this phenomenon in the Irish hotel industry.
In order to fully analyse the research topic, first of all it is necessary to present a brief
explanation about strategic HRM approaches to recognise how employees are fundamental
for the achievement of organisational objectives. In this topic, a short explanation about the
impact of high-performance work systems is presented to reinforce how ‘bundles’ of practices
can gradually improve organisational performance. As this research focuses on specific HR
practices, some insights about training and development, reward management and employee
wellbeing will be also discussed, relating them to employee retention. Next are some
important ideas about employee turnover, its causes and possible consequences to be
presented. Finally, a deeper look into employee turnover in hospitality industry seems
necessary to better understand the peculiarities of this sector.
2.2 Strategic Human Resource Management and the impact of HPWS
A strategic view of Human Resources has great importance on people as a meaning to
gain competitive advantage, particularly in service businesses with high frequency of
employee–customer interaction (Ahmad et al., 2010, p. 73-74). Strategic Human Resource
Management (SHRM) refers to a set of operational management practices that help to
increase business and create value, and to gain competitive advantage through human capital
(Ozen et al, 2012, p.118). Ozen et al (2012, p.132) affirm that if companies desire to achieve
long term success, they must make long-term strategic plans and execute these plans in an
effective way. Consequently, the ability of managing talent people becomes essential to
identify the key gaps between the talent in place and the talent required to drive business
success (Oladapo, 2014, p. 20). Although the importance of HRM is clearly in the hotel
scenario, Young-Thelin et al (2012, p. 335) emphasise that HR practices are not fully
developed in this industry and very little effort is put into ensuring their development. It is
quite predictable that a level of employee turnover is affected by this lack of interest in HRM.
7

It is believed that the adoption of ‘best practices’ can improve the attitudes and
behaviours of employees, decrease the levels of absenteeism and turnover, and increase the
skill levels of employees which can lead “to enhanced quality and efficiency and improved
productivity” (Young-Thelin et al, 2012, p. 335). The ‘best practice’ is the first approach
which study the relationship between HR practices and the company’s performance. Pfeffer
affirms that if organisations use balanced HR practices, in areas such as recruitment, training,
and rewards, they will have its performance improved (Gunnigle et al., 2006, p. 58). For
instance, Lynch & Worden (2010, in Young-Thelin et al, 2012, p. 339) mention in their
research in the Ritz-Carlton Hotel group, that the hotel “recruits the best employee by putting
more focus on the behavioural skills of the candidate, and its T&D processes are in place and
80% of training is conducted in-house to have direct control over the appropriate training
method”. Hinkin and Tracey (2010, p. 166) mention “that the new employee training program
at Four Seasons Hotel lasts twelve weeks and includes a wide variety of experiential
activities, many of which are facilitated by senior managers, which offer to new employees a
direct means for learning about the company’s guest service philosophy and standards”.
However, some authors believe that a unique practice may not be the most appropriate
response to a given business environment. The ‘best fit’ approach affirms that HR strategies
should ‘fits to the organisation’s overall business strategy (Armstrong, 2009, p.35) which
helps the HR professionals determine whether certain practices will add sufficient value or
not. The ‘best-fit’ model argues that HRM becomes more effective when it is designed to fit
certain critical contingencies in the company’s specific context (Boxal and Purcell’s, 2000, p.
189). This also can be related to the hotel industry which operates in a labour market,
whereby there is lack of qualified candidates coupled with strong competition. An example is
cited by Young-Thelin et al (2012, p. 337) in their research about HR practices in small
Sweden hotels, as they found out that even though hotel managers understand the importance
of implementing T&D programs, they are usually not applied because of: first, the limited
financial resources; second, the benefits of T&D can be felt in the longer-term, and most of
employees have temporary positions; and finally, there is an absence of professional skills in
implementing training.
Besides these two approaches, the resource-based view (RBV) model affirms that a
basis for the competitive advantage of a firm is a bundle of valuable tangible or intangible
resources posed by the company (Dany et al, 2008, p. 2097). It means that companies may
copy the practices but, their results may differ if they do not have qualified employees. HRM
8

plays a key role in building and stimulating the human asset by planning how to recruit,
develop and motivate employees (Boxal and Purcell, 2000, p. 197). Indeed, this model
suggests that HRM practices should be thought in terms of specific resources to be developed
rather than in terms of a mechanical adoption of ‘best practices’. Based on the RBV model,
high-performance work systems (HPWS) are supposed to improve employee effectiveness in
order to have higher levels of organizational performance. They are also known as high-
performance work practices or high-involvement work systems, HPWS include managerial
practices such as staffing, compensation, flexible job assignments, teamwork, training, and
communication, which increase the empowerment of employees and increase their skills with
the intention of enhancing employees’ commitment towards organization’s goals (Lee et al,
2012, p. 19). In the research about labour productivity in small companies, Patel and Conklin
(2012, p. 224) affirm that combined HPWS helps to reduce turnover costs, which are
significant for a small firm and increases the perceived labour productivity. An illustration
presented by these authors refers to training and career development as the combination of
increasing involvement by providing training programs together with increasing of
commitment by providing career work policies leads to better productivity, “as employees
may be more motivated to remain with the firm and to apply their acquired skills” (Patel and
Conklin, 2012, p. 207).
By the same token, researches have shown that the supportive organizational culture
is important for HPWS practices to result in competitive advantage. Amongst results of their
study, Yoon-Ho et al (2015, p. 53) suggest that HPWS policies will be successful if
employees perceive the management’s engagement in adopting HPWS. Managers have an
essential role on ensuring the credibility of HPWS initiatives and developing trust with the
employees leading to higher levels of employee’s cooperation. Line managers, for example,
are key intermediaries between HRM integration and organisational performance. Dany et
al’’s research (2008, p. 2018) shows that the link between HRM integration and
organisational performance does not occur in all situations, mainly if companies are not
concerned about sharing the implementation of HRM policies with line managers.
Academic literature and researches have postulated that HRM practices help the
development and retention of best human resources available which results to positive results
service sectors (Peixoto, 2012, p. 10). Evidently, there is not only one particular HRM
strategy that will deliver success in all situations. In fact, hotels need to define a strategy
9

which is unique to their own situation in terms of context, goals, and the demands of
organisational stakeholders.
2.3 HR Practices
2.3.1 Training and Development
Changes in the context of the organisation increase the need to train and develop its
members to ensure the firm’s organisational success. A well-structured training and
development (T&D) program plays a central role to develop and strengthen the employees’
competencies (Beardwell and Thompson, 2014, p. 277). The HRM is responsible for creating
and implementing T&D programs, and HR professionals need to mobilise efforts that meet
both organisational goals and learning needs of the employees (Beardwell and Thompson,
2014, p.218). When considering T&D interventions, the organizational leaders should bear
in mind that traditional courses are not the only option. The methods are often divide into
formal (e.g. workshops, training courses and seminars) and informal (job rotation, coaching
and mentoring, special projects); therefore, HR and managers should be able to design,
implement and evaluate the most appropriate learning events (Beardwell and Thompson,
2014, p.277)
Researches indicate the importance of T&D for an organisational performance
(FALOLA et al 2014; Costen and Salazar, 2011; Ameeq-ul-Ameeq and Hanif, 2013).
Organisations that invest more in training have a significantly higher level of organizational
performance which is measured by the quality of the product or service offered, new product
development, ability to attract and retain essential employees, and customer satisfaction
(Costen and Salazar 2011, p. 276). In addition, Costen and Salazar (2011, p. 276) emphasise
that training increases the work satisfaction as it is an opportunity to develop new skills to
perform their duties to the company’s. Similarly, commitment is an important outcome
because the time and effort that an employee puts forth in any training program can lead to a
more committed worker (Brom, 2007, p. 6). Furthermore, it can be said that employees
recognise and appreciate the investment made by companies, and they recompense employers
with better commitment and productivity.
Clearly associated with these benefits, it is noticeable that T&D support to reduce
employee turnover as individuals develop a greater sense of what is self-worth and become
more valuable to the company (Dunlap, 2015, p. 20). Choi and Dickson (2010, p. 115), in
particular have presented in their findings how the investment on effective management
10

training programs can increase employee satisfaction and consequently reducing turnover.
Yamamoto (2013, p. 764) says in his research with job-specialists employees that the results
suggest that they believe training and development is enriching, and it tending to increase
retention for these employees. He added that “this is because of the belief that training and
development of organization actually makes up a large share in competency development of
workers” (Yamamoto, 2013, p. 764).
Besides, when these practices are adopted in conjunction with other HR practices,
they encourage greater employee satisfaction and it has the potential to reduce employee
turnover. In her research, Kennett (2013, p. 128) went further to discuss the relationship
between training and labour turnover: she introduced a training and development framework
for management application which leads to different impacts on employee turnover. Amongst
her conclusions, it is said that when ‘team development model’ – in which training and
development was developed by managers and their teams together based on skill gaps and
learning identified needs – was adopted, there were more chances to reduce employee
turnover.
All the examples below show the importance of running training and development
programs. It is also important to say that an employee’s decision to stay or leave is affected
by existence or not of career growth within a company. In the research about employee
loyalty in Romanian hotels, Ineson and Berechet (2011, p. 142) mention that 50% of
interviewed employees who are considering leaving their jobs are doing so in order to find
better career opportunities. Besides that, a research in a telecommunications company in
Ghana showed that significant percentage of respondents were not aware whether their career
was growing or not (Kwenin, 2013, p. 5); and this may bring out negative implications for
employee engagement. Last, in a research done with ‘generation Y’ undergraduate students
with working experience in the hospitality industry, the findings suggest that students are
focused on their career, and they have a top priority in succeeding and achieving an upward
promotion (Maxwell et al, 2010, p. 60). These studies have shown that by doing a unique
career development program, companies can increase employee retention, and positively
increase productivity and profits. It appears that a planned career path with opportunities for
promotion and job challenges would help to retain most employees.
In short, the assumption may rely on trained employees remain within the investing
organisation. Therefore, HRM must stimulate employees’ capabilities through different ways,
11

and professionals also must be aware of massive digital transformations in the learning and
training industry (Deloitte, 2015, p. 25). It is important to note however, that T&D practices
alone may offer many benefits but a much greater impact will be found when aligning with
other human resources practices and policies (Brom, 2007, p.11). Training is a bridge that can
lead to employee satisfaction and a higher retention rate for the company.
2.3.2 Reward Management
Reward Management refers to development, implementation and monitoring of
processes, practices and procedures to compensate employees based on their contribution and
value to the organisation (Armstrong, 2014, p. 357). Suttapong et al add that (2014, p. 47) the
implementation of a reward system must fit the overall organisation’s business and HR
strategies, the significance attached to reward matters by top management, and the internal
and external environment. Therefore, it is fundamental that the reward management must fit
within the overall management style of any organisation, and must reinforce and support
desired behaviours and culture.
Rewards can be classified into two categories: extrinsic and intrinsic. Extrinsic
rewards are awards that are tangible or physically given to employee for accomplishing
something such as pay, promotions, merit bonuses, private office space, etc. (Özutku, 2012,
p. 31). Researches have shown that pay-level satisfaction has pervasive effects on build up
job satisfaction and affective commitment and reduce turnover intention (Schreurs et al,
2013, p. 414). Also, the previous survey mentioned done by Towers Watson (2014, p.3)
indicates that employees recognise a fair and competitive base pay as the first reason to stay
in the company, followed by opportunities for career advancement.
But rewards are not just about pay and employee benefits. There are intrinsic rewards
which are those that originate from within the person such as feelings of achievement,
challenge, autonomy, responsibility, and recognition, and often exist in the job itself (Özutku,
2012, p. 31). These types of rewards are closely related to employee motivation because they
are factors that drives individuals to behave in a certain way (Hutchinson, 2013, p.50). And
motivation varies depend on individual: some people consider money as the main motivator
whereas others prefer greater levels of responsibility and autonomy, or a better work-life
balance (Hutchinson, 2013, p.49). Following these statements, the research of Beltrán-Martín
and Roca-Puig (2013, p.662) presents that job enrichment – an example of intrinsic
motivation – is a type of motivation that encourages employees to show greater flexibility in
12

their job, even more than monetary compensation. An equally significant aspect is presented
by Yamamoto (2013, p. 764) as he said that when employees perceive that companies make
improvements on employee benefits, they tend to increase retention for employees with high
specialty commitment.
This recognition of people being motivated by a combination of these two types of
reward has supported the concept called ‘total rewards’. The use of the term describes an
approach of managing rewards which emphasises the need to consider all aspects of the
working experience that are important to employees (Armstrong, 2014, p.365). It can also be
said that total reward is a combination of tools used by companies in order to attract, retain,
motivate and satisfy employees, encompassing all investments made in its workforce, and
everything employees value in the employment relationship (Beardwell and Thompson, 2014,
p.467). Given these advantages of implementing a strategic reward management, it is quite
surprising that some companies still do not recognise those benefits. According to a survey
by CIPD (2014, p. 40), a significant number of employees agree that their organisation do not
appropriately recognise or rewards employee success and achievement.
When properly designed, implemented and communicated, a company’s reward
system can provide an incentive for talented people to join a company, for employees
perform at high levels and remain with the company (Kwon and Hein, 2013, p. 32). Indeed,
one of aims of reward management is to attract and retain valuable employees, so that
companies can achieve a higher return on their investment in employees’ benefits by
operating a reward system.
2.3.3 Employee Wellbeing
The legislation requires the employer to provide a safe and healthy environment, but
the recognition that a wellbeing and healthy workforce has increased due to social attitudes
changing and the employee expectations (Pilbeam and Corbridge, 2010, p. 415). Employee
wellbeing refers to “creating an environment to promote a state of contentment which allows
employees to flourish and achieve their full potential for the benefit of themselves and their
organisation” (CIPD, 2007, cited in Pilbeam and Corbridge, 2010, p.415). In order to create
this working environment the organisation need to manage stress, assist to work-life balance
issues, deal with sexual harassment and bullying problems, provide employees assistance and
groups services such as restaurants and social/sporting facilities (Armstrong, 2014, p. 445).
13

A focus on wellbeing is particularly important at the moment as the organisations and
their employees face a competitive scenario. Over the last few years many people have
experienced being in work-life balance programmes while encouraging and supporting
employees’ participation in these activities, then there will be a return on investment in these
programmes. In the UK scenario, a study identified that business investing in wellness
programmes also had an improvement in their financial benefits (PricewaterhouseCoopers,
2008, p. 22).
In addition, a case study presented by the CIPD survey shows that the size of a
company does not matter in taking steps to improve the wellbeing of its workers. The
example refers to a small company which applied small health and wellbeing initiatives such
as encouraging no smoking and healthy eating; giving time to attend external wellbeing
courses free of charge; reminders and discussions about wellbeing topics (2007, p.13).
Therefore, wellbeing does not have to be expensive and can be incorporated into and enhance
existing HR policies, such as training, total reward, and flexible working. Besides, the
policies need to be flexible, relevant and understood by the whole organisation. What is
important to emphasise is that good employees are physically and mentally able, willing to
contribute in the workplace and likely to be more engaged at work.
2.4 Employee retention
It was said that companies have applied HRM practices and policies in order to
maintain their employees within the organisation. Having a high employee turnover –
meaning the process of replacing one worker with another- brings on some implications for
employers (Pilbeam and Corbridge, 2010, p.107). Finding a right employee for an
organisation is an investment of time and money, and all efforts are simply wasted when the
employee leaves (Mackay, 2007, p. 64). The research findings of Davidson et al (2010, p.
461) illustrate how the cost of turnover is at an extraordinarily high level in the Australian
hotel industry: “without including the intangible costs of loss productivity and service
quality, an average hotel in this survey spent A$109,909 for replacing executive, managerial
and supervisory staff each year”. Pilbeam and Corbridge, (2010, p.1 08) also affirms that
labour turnover can be a problem when there is less availability of suitable employees in
some market conditions. It could also be said that employees who stay a considerable time in
a workplace know better the organisation, and when they leave their jobs, they take with
14

them valuable knowledge about the “company, customers, current projects and past history –
sometimes to competitor” (Ratna and Chawla, 2012, p. 36).
In this manner, retaining strategies seems essential to ensure effectively organisational
performance. The strategies include knowing how to attract individuals to the organisation, to
identifying early signs and reasons why valued employees may be thinking about leaving and
providing a good work environment where staff can see the opportunities in their careers
(Harvard Business School, 2006, p. 19). In her research for The Society for Human Resource
Management, Lockwood (2006, p. 2) emphasises that the companies should implement
effective talent management policies and practices that demonstrate commitment to human
capital which result in more engaged employees and lower turnover – and clearly, these
policies and strategies are interconnected with other HR practices such as learning and
development, and rewards.
Having an engaged workforce helps to increase the level of employees’ satisfaction
towards their jobs. Evidence for in support of this position can be found in the research of
Hausknecht et al (2009, p.283) with employees in the leisure and hospitality industry: in
their findings, job satisfaction emerged as the primary retention factor, followed by extrinsic
rewards, and constituent attachments. In the recent survey Global Human Capital Trends by
Deloitte (2015, p.35-36) the employee engagement and culture issues were identified as the
main challenge around the interviewed companies: research shows that in most companies
engagement is low, and “66% of HR respondents reported that they are updating their
engagement and retention strategies”. This reinforce Lockwood’s study as he reinstate the
responsibility of HR on identifying and developing strategies to engage employees by driving
satisfaction, loyalty and retention (2006, p. 3). But we should also consider the role of
managers and supervisors in fostering organisational culture and engaging workforce. The
mentioned Deloitte survey suggests that leaders are responsible for building a strong and
enduring culture, listening to feedback, and engaging and retaining their teams” (2015, p. 38).
Similarly concerning about organisational climate, a research with hospital staff shows that
the quality of human relations amongst co-workers influences the retention of these
employees (Hwang & Chang, 2009, p. 77).
It is important to note, however, that employee turnover is not always harmful for
organisations. Replacement of those who leave the organisation brings new qualified
employees who can add value to business (Pilbeam and Corbridge, 2010, p. 107). But if
15

companies desire to implement retaining strategies, they need to not focus only on retaining
“particularly talent people, but also people that are delivering an acceptable level of
performance” (Mackay, 2007, p. 64). Some workers are able to give a lot more to the
company then the average, and the managers must find what skills they have and utilise these
to the fullest, while understanding their needs and expectations.
2.5 Employee turnover in hospitality industry
It is known that hospitality industry is a highly guest service–oriented business, and
the success of this industry is primarily dependent on the quality of the employees and on
how effectively they are managed. However management of staff is a central challenge
affecting the HR professionals in the hospitality industry because employee turnover is one of
the major problems in this industry (Faldetta et al, 2013, p. 584).
The academic literature cites many reasons for the high turnover rate in the hospitality
industry. As it was mentioned the seasonal nature of the industry is one of the explanations
that lead to casual employment or seasonal workers (Faldetta et al, 2013, p. 584). The lack of
compensation and excessive workload are often cited as the most common reason to leave
organisations in this sector (Deloitte, 2010, p. 38). Although these motives for leaving tend to
be external to the employee rather than internal, employee might be also leaving due to
personal specific reasons (Dusek et al, 2014, p. 88).
Even though these researches have presented valuable reasons for employee turnover
in the hotel industry, some authors affirm that the high turnover cannot be excused as an
inherent characteristic feature of the hotel industry, which suggest that it is, in effect,
manageable through effective and strategic HR practices (Faldetta et al, 2013, p. 585). For
example, according to Liao et al (2009, p. 1821) if an employer wants to reduce the turnover
rate in a hotel industry, it is important that employees feel satisfied with their jobs and
thereby improve commitment to the organisation. Besides, Mapelu and Jumah (2013, p. 47)
suggest that training together with other HR strategies can lead to greater employee
commitment and a more stable workforce.
Finally, in his research, Kyuhwan, (2006, p. 333) recommend that managers improve
the work environment through methods such as compensation to create trust and satisfaction
towards the organisation. Beyond monetary compensations, Dawson & Abbott (2011, p. 300)
suggest a model to explain when companies have HR practices that enable a firm to facilitate
a hospitality culture and climate for exceptional service, they will have a positive influence
16

on organisational commitment, and consequently they will have more power to attract and
retain their employees.
Despite these benefits, the CIPD survey (2013, p. 12) shows that 44% of people
surveyed said their organisation does not promote health and wellbeing, and “micro, small
and medium-sized organisations were more likely to say their organisation doesn’t promote
employee health and wellbeing than those employ”. However from the examples above, it is
noticeable that high labour turnover became a challenge, but HRM is able to create robust
strategic plans to retain critical employees and manage staff turnover.
2.6 Literature Conclusion
By analysing the academic literature, it is possible to gain greater insight into
relationship between employee retention and some of the HR activities. Managers have
recognised that employees are an important asset for the organisation, and particularly in the
hospitality industry, their role is a key issue because they are most likely to have a direct
impact on customer satisfaction and loyalty which is an important contributor to profitability
in this sector.
It can be seen from the above analysis that there are many different factors that impact
on employee turnover rates, but HR practices can support to reduce it. In fact, the adoption of
high performance work practices seems effective to align the output of the workforce with the
objectives of the organisation. For instance, developing training and learning programs is
important because investing in employees helps increase employee engagement and
commitment to the organisation (Falola et al 2014; Costen and Salazar, 2011; Ameeq-ul-
Ameeq and Hanif, 2013). Besides, we have seen that improving career strategies appears as a
key driver of attraction and retention because employees feel valued and empowered.
The reward system has also supported to maximise employees satisfaction and
broadly their work experience. It is vital for companies to better differentiate both base salary
increase and annual incentives as extrinsic rewards are important factors to be included in a
reward management. But intrinsic rewards also seem fundamental when examining the
reward package as a whole. Researches have shown that when companies boost feelings of
achievement, challenge, autonomy, responsibility, and recognition, they can have positive
employee outcomes (Beltrán-Martín and Roca-Puig, 2013; Yamamoto, 2013). Furthermore,
companies can adopt a number of positive decisions to assist people to maximise their
physical and mental health (CIPD, 2007, p. 4). We have seen that employees have stronger
17

commitment to their organisations when they perceive that they are committed towards their
wellbeing (Pilbeam and Corbridge, 2010, p. 415).
It’s no surprise that employers carefully manage by HR policies and practices are
more likely to remain with their employers. Indeed, if these strategies are aligned and they
are working towards common goals, they have more impact than isolated approaches goals.
Before analysing how this phenomenon is presented in the Irish hotel market, the
methodology used for the research will be outlined in the next chapter.

18

3. Methodology

3.1 Methodology Introduction
In the following stages of this chapter, the areas of research philosophies, research
approaches and the different research strategies and designs will be presented. The reasons
are given to justify why the researcher chose certain methods over other ones. Furthermore,
some of methodological limitations and ethical issues are also considered for conducting this
proposal.
The choices are based on the research ‘onion’ (see figure 1), first introduced in 1997
by Saunders et al., it describes the different stages that are involved in the research process.
The outer layers of the onion involve the research philosophies and approaches. The middle
layers are grounded in research strategies and choices; and in the core of the onion, the data
collection and data analysis are considered.
Figure 1 The research ‘onion’

Source: Saunder et al, 2012, p. 128

19

3.2 Research Design
3.2.1 Research Philosophy
It is important for this research to identify how the HR department woks in Irish
hotels, and to relate it to possible reasons and motives why employees are leaving their
position in these places. For this reason, the philosophy behind this dissertation is
interpretivism which emphasises “the importance of interpretation and observation in
understanding the social word” (Snape and Spencer, 2003, cited in Hennink, et al, 2011 p.
14). Thus, interpretivism researchers not only interact with environment but also seek to
make sense of it through their interpretation of events in accordance with meanings that they
give to these events (Saunder et al, 2012, p. 137).
The interpretive philosophy believes that business and management areas are too
complex and unique to be formulated in theories and laws in the same way as the physical
sciences (Saunder et al, 2012, p. 137). In contrast to positivism philosophy which is based on
highly structured methodology to enable generalization and quantifiable observations, the
interpretivism is not favourable to broader generalizations (Hennink, et al, 2011, p. 14). By
taking an interpretivism stance, this research aims to gain a particularly understanding of
some HR practices applied for hotels and how this can be related to employee’s retention in
this industry in Ireland. Following this philosophy, the researcher did not start with concepts
determined a priori but rather sought to allow these to emerge from encounters in the field.
By carrying out interviews, this study aims to develop relevant and true statements
about the HR practices in the hotel industry. For this reason, interpretivism approaches ensure
an adequate dialog between the researcher and HR professionals in the companies in order to
collaboratively construct a meaningful reality. For this happens, it is indispensable that the
researcher do not generalise data by personal viewpoint and values (Saunder et al, 2012, p.
137). Despite this challenge, the primary data generated via interpretivism methods might be
associated with a high level of validity because data in such studies are likely to be reliable
and honest.
3.2.2 Research Approach
There are two main approaches in which research can be based upon: deductive and
inductive. Firstly, according to Saunder et al (2012, p. 145) the deduction approach does not
depend on observation or experience, “it involves the development of a theory that is then
20

subjected to test through a series of prepositions”. They also affirm that by adopting a
deductive attitude, the researcher has to measure these prepositions, often quantitatively.
Secondly, induction approach involves drawing a concept framework based on evidence
found from data collection and following research’s analysis from the theoretical studies
exists in the literature.
This research will be conducted by an inductive approach as the research moves from
specific observations to broader generalizations and theories. As it was mentioned by
Saunder et al (2012, p. 146), by going to the field, the researcher get a feel of what is going
on to better comprehend the nature of the problem. The result of all this process is usually
expressed as a conceptual framework. In this case, the researcher aims to formulate a
conceptual framework about the relationship between some HR practices and employee
retention based on the data analysis. Indeed, it seems a more flexible approach because there
is no requirement of pre-determined theory to collect data and information. In contrast to
deduction approach, the induction method permits alternative explanations that may emerge
during the data collection.
Inductive approach is highly associated with the interpretivism philosophy. This
approach allows the researcher to provide cause-effect link made between HR practices and
employee retention; then conclusions are drawn from the findings that are open to
interpretation when considering that every individual has different experiences and opinions.
3.2.3 Research Strategy
Having identified the research approach, it is important to define the type of research
design applied for this study. According to Sekaran and Bougie (2010, p.103), studies can be
exploratory, descriptive or hypothesis testing. This study has taken an exploratory approach
as there is a need to have a better comprehension about a topic of interest (Sekaran and
Bougie, 2010, p. 104). In this case, the researcher went to the “field” to investigate about the
HR practices in the Irish hotel industry looking for similarities and disparities.
The issue is analysing similar situations in the hotels, so a case study strategy is a
valuable approach of exploring a research topic or phenomenon within its context ((Saunder
et al, 2012, p.179). It is a relevant method if the research question seeks to explain some
present circumstances: how and why some social phenomenon works or if your research
questions require an “in-depth” description of some social phenomenon (Saunder et al, 2012,
p. 179). Besides, as an exploratory study, case study can use different data collection