BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO
TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC DÂN LẬP HẢI PHÒNG
——————————-
ISO 9001:2015
KHÓA LUẬN TỐT NGHIỆP
NGÀNH: NGÔN NGỮ ANH
Sinh viên : Trịnh Thị Đào Nguyên
Giảng viên hướng dẫn: Th.S Nguyễn Thị Quỳnh Hoa
HẢI PHÒNG – 2020
BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO
TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC DÂN LẬP HẢI PHÒNG
———————————–
ACTIVE LEARNING-THE IMPACT OF ACTIVE LEARNING
ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND STUDENT’S
ATTITUDES TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING
IN ENGLISH CLASS
KHÓA LUẬN TỐT NGHIỆP ĐẠI HỌC HỆ CHÍNH QUY
NGÀNH: NGÔN NGỮ ANH
Sinh viên : Trịnh Thị Đào Nguyên
Giảng viên hướng dẫn: Th.s Nguyễn Thị Quỳnh Hoa
HẢI PHÒNG – 2020
BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO
TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC DÂN LẬP HẢI PHÒNG
————————————–
NHIỆM VỤ ĐỀ TÀI TỐT NGHIỆP
Sinh viên: Trịnh Thị Đào Nguyên.
Mã SV: 1312401114
Lớp: NA1802.
Ngành: Ngôn Ngữ Anh
Tên đề tài: Active learning-The impact of Active learning on student
performance and student’s attitudes toward Active learning in English class
NHIỆM VỤ ĐỀ TÀI
1. Nội dung và các yêu cầu cần giải quyết trong nhiệm vụ đề tài tốt nghiệp
( về lý luận, thực tiễn, các số liệu cần tính toán và các bản vẽ).
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
2. Các số liệu cần thiết để thiết kế, tính toán.
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
3. Địa điểm thực tập tốt nghiệp.
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………..
CÁN BỘ HƯỚNG DẪN ĐỀ TÀI TỐT NGHIỆP
Người hướng dẫn thứ nhất:
Họ và tên: Nguyễn Thị Quỳnh Hoa
Học hàm, học vị: Thạc sĩ
Cơ quan công tác: Trường Đại học Dân Lập Hải Phòng
Nội dung hướng dẫn: Active learning-The impact of Active learning on
student performance and student’s attitudes toward Active learning in English
class
Người hướng dẫn thứ hai:
Họ và tên:…………………………………………………………………………………
Học hàm, học vị:………………………………………………………………………..
Cơ quan công tác:………………………………………………………………………
Nội dung hướng dẫn:………………………………………………………………….
Đề tài tốt nghiệp được giao ngày … tháng ….. năm …..
Yêu cầu phải hoàn thành xong trước ngày …. tháng ….. năm ……
Đã nhận nhiệm vụ ĐTTN Đã giao nhiệm vụ ĐTTN
Sinh viên
Người hướng dẫn
Trịnh Thị Đào Nguyên
Th.S Nguyễn Thị Quỳnh Hoa
Hải Phòng, ngày …… tháng……..năm 20..
Hiệu trưởng
GS.TS.NGƯT Trần Hữu Nghị
CỘNG HÒA XÃ HỘI CHỦ NGHĨA VIỆT NAM
Độc lập – Tự do – Hạnh phúc
PHIẾU NHẬN XÉT CỦA GIẢNG VIÊN CHẤM PHẢN BIỆN
Họ và tên giảng viên: ………………………………………………………………..
Đơn vị công tác: ………………………………………………………………..
Họ và tên sinh viên: ……………………………………………………………….
Chuyên ngành: ………………………………………………………………..
Đề tài tốt nghiệp: …………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………….
1.
Phần nhận xét của giáo viên chấm phản biện
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
2.
Những mặt còn hạn chế
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
3.
Ý kiến của giảng viên chấm phản biện
Được bảo vệ Không được bảo vệ Điểm phản biện
Hải Phòng, ngày … tháng … năm …..
Giảng viên chấm phản biện
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………………………………..
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
……………………………………………………………………. iv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
………………………………………………………………….. v
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
……………………………………………………….. vi
CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY ………………………………………… 1
1. Rationale
……………………………………………………………………………………………… 1
2. Aims of the study …………………………………………………………………………………. 2
3. Research questions
……………………………………………………………………………….. 2
4. Scope of the study
………………………………………………………………………………… 2
5. Research methodology ………………………………………………………………………….. 2
6. Structure of the study ……………………………………………………………………………. 3
CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
…………………………………… 5
1. An overview of Active learning
……………………………………………………………… 5
1.1. Definition of Active learning ………………………………………………………………. 5
1.2. Theory of Active Learning
………………………………………………………………….. 6
1.3 Form of active learning ……………………………………………………………………….. 7
1.3.1 Learning by doing ……………………………………………………………………………. 7
1.3.2 Self-regulated learning ……………………………………………………………………… 8
1.3.3 Game-based learning ………………………………………………………………………… 9
1.4 Models of Active learning …………………………………………………………………. 10
1.5 Active learning methods
…………………………………………………………………….. 13
1.5.1 Think-pair-share ……………………………………………………………………………. 14
1.5.2 Team- based learning
……………………………………………………………………… 14
1.5.3 Practical exercises …………………………………………………………………………. 15
1.5.4 The fish bowl
…………………………………………………………………………………. 15
1.5.5 Minute papers
………………………………………………………………………………… 16
1.5.6 Concept maps ………………………………………………………………………………… 16
1.5.7 Categorizing grids ………………………………………………………………………….. 17
2
Difference between Passive learning and Active learning ……………………… 17
2.1
Advantages and disadvantages of Active learning
……………………………… 17
2.2
Advantages and disadvantages of Passive learning : ………………………….. 18
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODS ……………………………………………….. 19
1 . Qualitative research
……………………………………………………………………………. 23
2. Quantitative research
………………………………………………………………………….. 19
3. Interview research ………………………………………………………………………………. 20
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISSCUSION ……………………………………… 23
1.The reality of Active learning and Traditional learning in AMES ENGLISH
CENTER ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 23
ii
1.1
The teaching staffs:
………………………………………………………………………… 23
1.2 Students : ………………………………………………………………………………………. 23
1.3
The materials : ………………………………………………………………………………. 24
1.4
English teaching methods in AMES
…………………………………………………. 24
2.Research …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 26
2.1 . Research Subjects
……………………………………………………………………………. 26
2.2. Background information about subject collected through the survey …….. 29
2.3 Research design
………………………………………………………………………………… 32
2.4
The data analysis
……………………………………………………………………………. 34
2.4.1 The result from the student’s test ……………………………………………………… 34
2.4.2
The result from the student’s attitude
…………………………………………….. 36
3. Findings …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 37
3.1
Downsides of Traditional learning in English class ……………………………. 37
3.2 Problems Related to the Use of Active Learning in Kids class ……………….. 38
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION
…………………………………………………………………. 39
1.Conclusion
………………………………………………………………………………………….. 39
2.Recommendations ……………………………………………………………………………….. 39
2.1 Transitioning from Passive Learning to Active Training English Skills
…… 39
2.2 Some ways to get learners actively involved in the classroom
………………… 40
2.2.1.To teacher ……………………………………………………………………………………… 40
2.2.To student ………………………………………………………………………………………… 41
REFERENCES
………………………………………………………………………………………. 42
APPENDIX …………………………………………………………………………………………… 44
iii
ABSTRACT
The aim of the research presented in this paper is to give a detailed overview
of what active learning is. The presented information about forms, models and
methods of active learning are supposed to raise the reader’s interest and
awareness for the importance of students’ active participation in their learning
process. Various methods, ideas and researches are discussed in order to acquire
information about the meaning of active learning and its background.
In line with this purpose, the present study was carried out with 40
students in Starters class studying English at Ames English center in Hai
Phong during 3 months academic term. An experimental model with pre-test
and post-test and a control group was used. Activities based on active learning
were used in the treatment group, while teacher-centred instructional methods
were used in the control group. The data in the study were collected using
the ‘attainment test’ and ‘attitude scale’ for English lesson. Furthermore,
the attainment test was also used as the ‘retention test’ three weeks after it was
administered as the post-test. The purpose of the study is to investigate the
impacts of active learning and teacher-centred instruction on learners’
academic attainment, attitudes and retention of what is learned. The findings of
the study indicated that active learning methods boosted learners’ attainment
in English lesson and the retention of what is learned. However, the
learners’ attitude towards the lesson did not differ with respect to active learning
and traditional methods
The result of that study was to evaluate if students achieve better learning
outcomes when they are actively involved in the learning process. The results of
the thesis emphasize the importance of active learning as it helps the students to
process new information better and connect them to already existing knowledge
and experiences. The results indicate the necessity to make a change in teaching
methods. The focus should be on the students’ active participation and therefore
teaching methods such as active learning should be applied more often.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
In the process of doing the graduation paper, I have received a lot of
assistance, guidance, encouragement and idea contribution from my teachers,
family and friends.
First of all, I would like to express my deepest thanks to thesis adviso Ms
Nguyen Thi Quynh Hoa, MA who has lecture and instructions which help me a
lot in completing this study with her enthusiastic guidance, very helpful ideas
and instructions for the preparation and her correction through the process of
writing my graduation paper. She also inspired me to pursue my dream of
becoming a teacher by showing great support and motivation during my studies
in university. Without that inspiration, I might not have chosen to become a
teacher.
Also, I am very grateful to all the teachers at the Department of Foreign
Languages of Hai Phong Private University for their interesting and useful
lectures during the 4 years, which have built in me a firm foundation with
immense ideas for my fulfillment of this paper.
Next, I am also grateful to my friends from NA1802 at Hai Phong Private
University, who provided continuous support and encouragement throughout the
last four years of my studies and especially through the process of conducting
my research, but whom I cannot all mention here due to the inconvenience of
space.
Last but not least, I would like to give my heartfelt thanks to my family, to
whom I have never enough words to express my great gratitude for their
encouragement and inspiration.
v
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
No. Abbreviation
English full name
Vietnamese
Meaning
1
Eg
For example
Ví dụ
2
P
Page
Trang
3
Et AL
et alia
Cùng cộng sự
vi
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
No
Name
Content
Page
1
Picture 1
The 6 Levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956)
5
2
Picture 2
Dewey’s model of learning (Miettinen, 2000)
11
3
Picture 3
Picture 2. Smart and Csapo’s model of
learning
12
4
Picture 4
The learning Pyramid
13
5
Picture 5
The Active learning and Passive learning
Pyramid
17
6
Table 1
Standards between Active learning and
Passive learning
32,33
7
Figure 1
Figs. 1 The results of placememt test
34
8
Figure 2
Figs. 2 A comparison of results between
students taught with a traditional class
(passive) and students taught actively
35
9
Figure 3
Figs. 3 A comparison of student’s attittude
between students taught with a traditional
class (passive) and students taught actively
36
1
CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY
1. Rationale
For as long as we have had schools and universities, there has been a
debate raging about the most effective ways of learning. The most common
controversy rages by parents is over which of the many different ways of
transferring knowledge from teacher to student helps the student learn the
quickest, and retain knowledge for the longest time.
Traditional teaching method is often known as “chalk and talk”, is the
predominant teaching method, especially in large lectures with many hundreds
of students. It involves teachers standing at the front of the class, writing on a
board and explaining concepts to their students. There is little opportunity for
students to ask questions or do any experimental work or to draw their own
conclusions about what they are being taught. There is however lots of criticism
of this sort of learning. It is clear to see how it would have limited success in
learning practical skills.
Societies in today’s world, which is getting smaller and smaller
with the impact of rapidly developing technology, are in need of individuals
who are not only merely taught to memorize and regurgitate facts but also are
able to develop a true understanding of the subject matter at hand. The greatest
responsibility, therefore, lies with the educational system with schools.
Educational systems throughout the world are continuously revised and
renovated. The demands of contemporary education are no longer possible to
meet in a system that emphasizes teaching and neglects the learning that goes on
in the classroom. The shift must be made towards active learning (Stoll & Fink,
2000; Peko et al., 2008). This will be possible when individuals transform
themselves from being passive recipients into active participators.
Unlike the traditional education, active learning, in the simplest
terms, is the process in which learners “learn to fish,” and it enables learners to
have opportunities such as questioning, researching, planning, discovering
and interpreting, which are indications of active participation . Active
learning allows students to engage in activity that will enhance their learning by
exploration. The contents focus on what students need to learn, not what
teachers want to teach.
.
2
2. Aims of the study
Within the framework of a minor thesis, the study is aimed at:
– Introduce what active learning is.
– Present information about forms, models and methods of active learning
– The impacts of active learning on student’ academic attainment,
attitudes and retention of what is learned.
– Give some suggestions with the hope to assure the training quality for
students in order to meet the outcome criteria and help students who know their
own learning style become better learners.
1. Research questions
– What is active learning ?
– What are advantages and dis advantages of active learning ?
2. Scope of the study
With the limitation of time ,resources, space and knowledge of mine, as
well as some other conditions , this study was carried out to find out the reality
of teaching English at Active Learning for Kids and Teens class and the
effectiveness of Active learning teaching method as well as offering some
techniques to promote active learning in classroom . Thus, the result of study is
limited only to those students participating in this study and these findings may
impact the generalization to the larger population of all students and they can
also be the references for anyone who wants to teach or learn English actively.
5. Research methodology
Getting a scientific method of study is very important. In order to finish
my graduation paper, I have tried with my best effort to search the necessary
documents in reference books or from web pages on the internet. After reading
clearly those references, I tried to get and select the valuable information
relating to my study.
The main method is desk research: the press, the Internet, analytical
reports and statistical publications. Every effort was made to obtain the relevant
literature from all the available resources. This is then followed by cross
3
referencing and the collation of data. These base on myself experience: During
the working time in AMES ENGLISH CENTER, I had chance to participate in
teaching at Active learning class for kids and teens.
With a hope that learners could have an overview of active learning, the
following methods are used in the studying process:
– Firstly, interviews with teachers and students. To student, I elect 40
students in Starters class studying English at Ames English center in Hai Phong
during 3 months academic term. To teacher, a survey questionnaire relating
active learning was conducted to gather information and evidence for the study.
– Secondly, interview items, including final test and midterm test of
students. And then get information from Internet because it supplies such a large
source of information relating to the subject of my paper graduation.
– In addition, to make the data collected more reliable and authentic,
qualitative method was applied with two instruments: an informal
interview
and observation. All the comments, remarks, recommendations and
conclusion provided in the study were based on the data analysis of the study.
– Last but not least, in order to accomplish the thesis, a flexible
combination of methods is employed, which embraces collection,
categorizing and analyzing of data, and description of result. I think it will be
useful for the study of the topic.
6. Structure of the study
The study is divided into four chapters:
–
Part I, Introduction, includes the rationale to the study. It also includes
the aims of the study, research subjects, the scope of the study. Next the design
of the study is also presented.
– Part II, The study consists of three chapters:
Chapter 1, Literature review, presents a review of related literature that
provides the definition of active learning, form, models of active learning and
some active learning methods.
4
Chapter 2, The study on learning and teaching English for kids class,
focuses on English learning and teaching environment at AMES CENTER, the
survey in which the objectives of the survey, the subjects, and the methods of
the study are studied. Chapter 2 also studies on the findings and data analysis ,
the findings and discussion of findings as well as the recommending for
transitioning from Passive Learning to Active Training English Skills
Chapter 3, Some suggested techniques in Active learning class.
In the third chapter shows the research findings of the study about active
learning in AMES. The last chapter in this part is entitled “Recommendations” .
-Part III, Conclusions in active learning English through techniques are
made; some limitations and suggestions for further research are stated. The last
are references, the appendixes that include all the documents relating to the
study.
5
CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
1. An overview of Active learning
1.1. Definition of Active learning
The 6 Levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956)
The revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (Anderson, Krathwohl et
al, 2001 )
Bloom’s Taxonomy is a hierarchical ordering of cognitive skills
Active learning approaches will help students develop at every stage of
Bloom’s Taxonomy; it will enable learners to engage with the more complex
cognitive processes such as evaluate and create, and build a knowledge base that
begins with, but is not limited to, factual knowledge.
For example, to develop metacognitive knowledge students need to be
actively involved with, and aware of, their own learning.
Benjamin (1991) states that active learning has the following common
characteristics: Students are involved in more than listening; less emphasis is
placed on transmitting information and more on developing students’ skills.
Students are involved in higher-order thinking (analysis, synthesis, evaluation),
students are engaged in activities to practice using new knowledge and skills in
order (e.g. reading discussing, writing), and greater emphasis is placed on
students’ exploration of their own attitudes and values to develop long-term
recall and a deeper understanding. This deeper understanding will also enable
6
learners to connect different ideas together and to think creatively (Csapo &
Smart, 2007, p. 452).
Active learning refers to a teaching and learning approach whereby
students do more than simply listen to a lecture. Students are actively engaging
in the lesson – they are doing things like discovering, processing, and applying
information. As Meyers and Jones (1993) assert, Active learning involves
providing meaningful opportunities for students to talk, listen, write, read, and
reflect on the content, ideas, issues, and concerns of an academic subject.
In order to reach these goals, Simons (1997) points out that students
should plan and prepare the learning process themselves, engage in learning,
regulate their learning, control it and persist in the learning activities. As Meyers
and Jones (1993) assert , Acrive learning provides meaningful opportunities for
students to talk, listen, write, read, and reflect on the content, ideas, issues, and
concerns of an academic subject. Kyriacou (2001) states that active learning
should constantly be present in classrooms since students benefit from it in
numerous ways. It enables students to act autonomously and have control over
the classroom activities. It plays a significant role in student motivation, since it
links problem-based teaching to innate curiosity and the need for exploration of
every child. It gives a new kind of quality to the school experience. It has greater
influence on students’ everyday lives. The experience of active learning has a
strong impact on personality and it makes school more similar to real life.
It can be contrasted with a passive approach to learning in which the
teacher primarily talks ‘at’ students and simply assumes they will make sense of
what is said without needing to check.
1.2. Theory of Active Learning
There are many learning theories that guide the teaching and learning
process. These learning theories influence the ways in which teachers approach
instruction in their classrooms. Generally, these learning theories can be grouped
into two categories: those that follow the traditional teacher-centred approach,
and those that follow the modern student-centred approach. Proponents of the
7
teacher-centred approach adhere to an objective model known as positivist
epistemology, which serves as the basis for behaviourism. Advocates of a
student-centred approach, meanwhile, are adherents to constructivist or
interpretivist epistemology, which claims that knowledge is formed by the
construction of meaning by the learners themselves.
Learner-centered education puts the learner at the heart of the classroom,
rather than the instructor. “Learner-centered classroom practices engage students
in activities that require reasoning, discovering, problem solving, data gathering,
application, and communication of ideas” (Golightly, 2010, p. 234).
Active learning is based on a theory of learning called constructivism,
which emphasises the fact that learners construct or build their understanding.
Constructivist learning theory emphasizes that individuals learn through
building their own knowledge, connecting new ideas and experiences to existing
knowledge and experiences to form new or enhanced understanding (Bransford
et al., 1999)
Jean Piaget (1896–1980), a psychologist and founder of constructivism,
researched the cognitive development of children, observing that their
knowledge was individually built up, bit by bit. In the process of making
meaning, children replace or adapt their existing knowledge and understanding
with deeper levels of understanding. The theory of social constructivism says
that learning happens primarily through social interaction with others, such as a
teacher or a learner’s peers.
1. 3 Form of active learning
1.3.1 Learning by doing
Learning by doing refers to a theory of education expounded by American
philosopher John Dewey. In the light of active learning, the theory learning by
doing has a significant meaning .It’s a hands-on approach to learning, meaning
students must interact with their environment in order to adapt and learn. Dewey
described the search for knowledge as a practical process and pointed out that
children should always get the chance to learn from experiences, which means
8
that they do things by themselves. He believes that students should do
something in order to learn. Physical action of individuals leads to construction
of their points of view on reality and therewith they deepen their understanding
for the new knowledge that they receive. Moreover, he believes that students
should get the chance to connect the new things they learn to already known
things in order to give the new knowledge a meaning.
Piaget explained that individuals have to create a connection within the
different topics they learn about in order to understand the reality (Vollmers,
1997, p. 79). Personal and active experiences are more important than only
visual instruction, no matter how good that instruction is. It is not enough for
children to receive information and knowledge through reading education books
or listening to the teacher’s lectures. It is necessary that students find solutions
to problems by themselves and actively take part in research in order to acquire
knowledge.
1.3.2 Self-regulated learning
Self-regulated learning (SRL) is one of the domains of self-regulation, and
is aligned most closely with educational aims. Self-regulation from the social
cognitive perspective looks at the triadic interaction among the person (e.g.,
beliefs about success), his or her behavior (e.g., engaging in a task), and the
environment (e.g., feedback from a teacher).
Self-regulated learning emphasizes autonomy and control by the individual
who monitors, directs, and regulates actions toward goals of information
acquisition, expanding expertise, and self-improvement.In particular, self-
regulated learners are cognizant of their academic strengths and weaknesses, and
they have a repertoire of strategies they appropriately apply to tackle the day-to-
day challenges of academic tasks. These learners hold incremental beliefs about
intelligence (as opposed to entity, or fixed views of intelligence). Students who
are self-regulated learners believe that opportunities to take on challenging
tasks, practice their learning, develop a deep understanding of subject matter,
and exert effort will give rise to academic success (Perry et al., 2006).
9
Self regulated learners are successful because they control their learning
environment. They exert this control by directing and regulating their own
actions toward their learning goals.
Research over the last 10 years has shown that not only older children or
university students can make use of self-regulated learning, but also younger
students in kindergarten or primary school. A research conducted by Hattie,
Biggs and Purdie, which is described in the article of Buettner, Dignath and
Langfeldt (2008, p.103), even showed that young children benefit most from the
method of self-regulated learning. Teaching young children in the beginning of
their education how to use such methods has the advantage that, by the time they
start their education, students only start to form their personal learning attitude.
Therefore, it is easier to correct their way of learning during that early time at
school than when the students have already developed their style and behavior
of learning when they are older There is a need to improve different learning
strategies through training in order to make sure to increase instructions of such
learning strategies in primary schools (Buettner, Dignath & Langfeldt, 2008, p.
104).
Self-regulated learning should be used in three different phases of
learning :
-The first phase is during the initial learning
-The second phase is when troubleshooting a problem encountered during
learning
-The third phase is when they are trying to teach others.
1.3.3 Game-based learning
Game-based learning focuses on teaching all theoretical subjects through
games and perception in an organized, active and effective way. The’s need to
play and experience subject matters through different sensory organs is the
centre point of this teaching method. Therefore, it can be said that this teaching
method is a type of active learning. It is an efficient form because it incorporates
10
gaming elements: challenges, fantasy, motivation, easy achievement metrics
(levels, ranking, score), as well as satisfaction by the achievement of goals.
Several reasons are given for why this method should be chosen for
teaching. It bridges the gap between different age groups and is individualised.
Furthermore, it increases the students’ motion, can be applied inside and outside,
reduces working at tables, and increases social skills as well as strengthening
students’ social relationships.
Karl Kapp (Gamification of Learning and Instruction, 2012) distinguishes
between two types of motivation: intrinsic and extrinsic. The first occurs after a
certain activity is performed; the second, extrinsic, is the behavior specifically
aimed to getting a reward. The best game-based learning is the one that has both
types of motivation.
Students are especially motivated when they feel they can control the
environment and establish relationships with other players. Game-based learning
methods incorporate competitive aspects (rankings, prizes, score), which serve
as motivators while they ensure that students will interiorize and embrace the
knowledge.
The narrative thread favors the involvement of students. Thanks to the
story told by many game-based learning courses, especially serious games,
students get immersed in the story and, through that narrative, they take lessons
and learn.
The game-based learning methodology clearly defines the goals that
students must achieve. This way, the importance of the contents is always
present above the aesthetic “packaging” which characterizes the game.
1.4 Models of Active learning
Dewey’s model of learning
Picture 1.Dewey’s model of learning (Miettinen, 2000)
11
Notes:
– John Dewey presented a model of learning with focus on reflective
thinking and action. Dewey chose practical activities in life based on habits as
the basic point and explained that reflective experiences develop from such
habitual experiences when intelligence and knowledge develop. He said that the
reason for reflection rises from the need to solve problems that learners have to
face by making habitual experiences. In addition to that, Dewey pointed out that
hypotheses, which are connected to reflection of problems and experiences, have
to be tested through active experiences in order to solve given problems.
– There are five different steps:
+The first step includes disturbance, hesitation and uncertainty as the
learner realizes that a usual activity does not work like it used to do or
something in its environment has changed. The reflective thinking starts in this
first step by hesitating, studying the conditions, difficulties and resources of
actions.
+ In the second step, the learner tries to define that problem and describe
the difficulty as the result of studying the problem in the first step. The
definition of the problem is important because it helps the learner to find
accurate suggestions for problem solving and decide which actions are necessary
and which are unnecessary.
12
+ In the third step, the material and social conditions, as well as the
resources that are needed to solve the problem, are analyzed and diagnosed. This
process is called creating a working hypothesis and it can be characterized as a
guiding plan or idea in the problem-solving process
+ Reasoning takes place in the fourth step, which means that the learner can
conduct thought experiments in order to test the working hypothesis in the light
of resources and knowledge. This step is important because these thought
experiments could give the first indications of how to solve the problem and
even show the learner that the working hypothesis might have to be
reformulated.
+ The last step in Dewey’s model is testing the working hypothesis in
action by recreating the initial situation in the light of the hypothesis’
requirements. This step is necessary in order to be able to draw conclusions of
the hypothesis validity. The outcomes of the problem-solving process are not
presented as a single step in the model, instead it is explained how the process
can have two kinds of results. Either the hypothesis gets confirmed as the
reconstruction of the initial situation leads to a solution of the problem that was
defined in the beginning or ideas or concepts are developed that can be used for
further solving of problem.
Smart and Csapo’s model of learning
Picture 2. Smart and Csapo’s model of learning
13
Notes:
-Smart and Csapo (2007, p. 453) introduced a four-step learning cycle in
the light of experiential learning as a particular part of active learning. The
model by Smart and Csapo indicates steps that are consecutive and therefore
closely connected to each other.
– Their learning cycle has 3 steps:
+ The first step is focused on creating experiences by being engaged in
planned activities. Such activities can include interactions with others, which
can give students the chance to work together, share responsibility for learning
and reach common goals.
+ The second step in the cycle asks for the students’ reflection, which is
necessary in order to understand the meaning of the different activities and is
therefore build on the experiences made in the first step.
+ The meaning that the students have formulated from the activities in the
second step needs to be generalised in the third step. Therefore, the students
have to connect the meaning to their own experiences and knowledge.
+ In the fourth step, the students are asked to apply the knowledge that they
received in the previous steps
1.5 Active learning methods
Commas in relative clause
